Slave nation
An honest and complete history of the United States would include the fact that its economy, especially in the South, was addicted to slavery…
And that slavery continued in the South protected by local laws, law enforcement, courts and judges through 1945 (with occasional episodes afterward.)
Amazingly, one of the primary beneficiaries of this period of Post-Emancipation neo-slavery was U.S. Steel.
For more info Google the book “Slavery by another name”
Today, people charged with petty drug crimes do hard time, work for a few cents an hour while in prison, and have their labor leased to Fortune 500 corporations.
And the US is building news prisons every day.
Little known fact: The US has a higher percentage of its citizens in prison than any other country on earth including Russia and China.
Above text from Brasscheck.tv
My Note: I would vote for pretty much any black person to be president. They would have to be really, really terrible for me not to vote for them. This is simply because blacks have had such a bum rap for so many years. Until there is some sort of equality we will continue to live in a stunted society. Even Condoliza Rice, who I can’t stand, I give her credit purely based on her skin color.
Call it reverse racism or affirmative action but I do think that a pro minority attitude will speed up the equalization of our society. When I mean minority I mean for the most part people who have had the financial brunt, of which the blacks and Indians fared the worst and continue to fare the worst.
I am infuriated by the current obsession to “bail out” the financial sector with huge amounts of money under the pretense that it will avoid a financial catastrophe. It will cause some belt tightening certainly. It might even restructure the whole financial market.
But it is a gross misappropriation of funds and shows how racist and classist our society continues to be. Never have I seen Bush so concerned for the welfare of others. OMG! CEO’s risk losing their jobs! White collar workers might have to take a pay break! The Horror!
Meanwhile the majority of America continues to struggle, like they done since the constitution. Lets face it, our so called democratic free market society might not be so great! It is great for a select few. Good for some. And pretty crappy for many.
The basic problem here is that humans have yet to find a societal structure that benefits the majority. From kingdoms to communism, the basic top down structure always seems to take over where you have an elite few living off the backs of the rest.
I increasingly think Anarchism is the best arrangement. Not the Anarchism of Hollywood scare mongers but the Anarchism of well meaning intelligent, mature people. If you really look at the theories of Anarchism you will find that a lot of them you practice already and the rest you would practice if you didn’t have stupid rules imposed on you that treat you like a child.Turistas on dvd
Chances are you have already heard something
about who anarchists are and what we are supposed
to believe. Chances are almost everything
you have heard is nonsense. Many people seem to
think that we anarchists believe in violence, chaos,
and destruction, that we are against all forms of
order and organisation, that we are crazed nihilists
who just want to blow everything up. In reality, nothing
could be further from the truth. We are simply
people who believe human beings are capable of
behaving in a reasonable way without having to be
forced to. It is really a very simple idea. But it’s one
that the rich and powerful have always found
extremely dangerous.
At their very simplest, anarchist beliefs turn on
to two basic ideas. The first is that human beings
are, under ordinary circumstances, about as reasonable
and decent as they are allowed to be, and
can organise themselves and their communities
without needing to be told how. The second is that
power corrupts. Most of all, anarchism is just a matter
of having the courage to take the simple principles
of common decency that most of us live by, and
to follow them through to their logical conclusions.
Odd though this may seem, in many important
ways, you are probably already an anarchist -you
just don’t realise it. Let’s start by taking a few examples
from everyday life:
* If there’s a line to get on a crowded bus, do you
wait your turn and not elbow your way past others
even if there aren’t any police around?
If you answered “yes”, then you are used to acting
like an anarchist! The most basic anarchist
principle is self-organisation: the assumption that
human beings do not need to be threatened with
arrest in order to be able to come to reasonable
understandings with each other, or to treat each
other with dignity and respect.
Everyone believes they are capable of behaving
reasonably themselves. If they think laws and
police are necessary, it is only because they don’t
believe that other people are. But if you think about
it, don’t those people all feel exactly the same way
about you? Anarchists argue that almost all the
anti-social behavior which makes us think it’s necessary
to have armies, police, prisons, and governments
to control our lives, is actually caused by the
systematic inequalities and injustice those armies,
police, prisons and governments make possible.
It’s all a vicious circle.
If people are used to being
treated like their opinions do not matter, they are
likely to become angry and cynical, even violent -
which of course makes it easy for those in power to
say that their opinions do not matter. Once they
understand that their opinions really do matter just
as much as anyone else’s, they tend to become
remarkably understanding. To cut a long story
short: anarchists believe that for the most part it is
power itself, and the effects of power, that make
people stupid and irresponsible.
* Are you a member of a club or sports team or any
other voluntary organisation where decisions are
not imposed by one leader but made on the basis of
general consent?
If you answered “yes”, then you belong to an
organisation which works on anarchist principles!
Another basic anarchist principle is voluntary association.
This is simply a matter of applying democratic
principles to ordinary life. The only difference
is that anarchists believe it is possible to have a
society in which everything is organised along these
lines, all groups based on the free consent of their
members, and therefore, that all top-down, military
styles of organisation like armies or bureaucracies
or large corporations, based on chains of command,
would no longer be necessary. Perhaps you
don’t believe that would be possible. Perhaps you
do.
But every time you reach an agreement by consensus,
rather than threats, every time you make a
voluntary arrangement with another person, come
to an understanding, or reach a compromise by taking
due consideration of other’s particular situation
or needs, you are being an anarchist - even if you
don’t realise it.
Anarchism is just the way people act when they
are free to do as they choose, and when they deal
with others who are equally free - and, therefore
aware of the responsibility to others this entails.
This leads to another crucial point: that while people
can be reasonable and considerate when they are
dealing with equals, human nature is such that they
cannot be trusted to do so when given power over
others. Give someone such power, they will almost
always abuse it in some way or another.
* Do you believe that most politicians are selfish,
egotistical swine who don’t really care about the
public interest? Do you think we live in an economic
system that is stupid and unfair?
If you answered “yes”, then you subscribe to the
anarchist critique of today’s society - at least, in its
broadest outlines. We Anarchists believe that
power corrupts and those who spend their entire
lives seeking power are the very last people who
should have it. We believe that our present economic
system is more likely to reward people for
selfish and dishonest behavior than for being
decent, caring human beings. Most people feel that
way.
The only difference is that most people don’t
think there’s anything that can be done about it, or
at least - and this is what the faithful servants of the
powerful are always most likely to insist on - anything
that won’t end up making things even worse.
But what if that weren’t true?
Is there really any reason to believe this? When
you can actually test them, most of the usual predictions
about what would happen without states or
capitalism turn out to be entirely untrue. For thousands
of years people lived without governments.
In many parts of the world people live outside of the
control of governments today. They do not all kill
each other.
Mostly they just get on with their lives
the same as anyone else would. Of course, in a
complex, urban, technological society all this would
be more complicated: but technology can also
make all these problems a lot easier to solve. In
fact, we have not even begun to think about what
our lives could be like if technology were really used
to benefit us all. How many hours would we really
need to work in order to maintain a functional society
- that is, if we got rid of all the useless or
destructive occupations like telemarketers, lawyers,
prison guards, financial analysts, public relations
experts, bureaucrats and politicians, and turn our
best scientific minds away from working on space
weaponry or stock market systems to mechanising
away dangerous or annoying tasks like coal mining
or cleaning the bathroom, and distribute the remaining
work among everyone equally? Five hours a
day? Four? Three? Two? Nobody knows because
no one is even asking this kind of question.
Anarchists think these are the very questions we
should be asking.
* Do you really believe those things you tell your
children (or that your parents told you)?
“It doesn’t matter who started it.” “Two wrongs
don’t make a right.” “Clean up your own mess.”
“Do unto others…” “Don’t be mean to people just
because they’re different.” Perhaps we should
decide whether we’re lying to our children when we
tell them about right and wrong, or whether we’re
willing to take our own injunctions seriously,
because if you take these moral principles to their
logical conclusions, you arrive at anarchism.
Take the principle that two wrongs don’t make a
knock away almost the entire basis for war and the
criminal justice system. The same goes for sharing:
we’re always telling children that they have to learn
to share, to be considerate of each other’s needs, to
help each other; then we go off into the real world
where we assume that everyone is naturally selfish
and competitive. But an anarchist would point out:
in fact, what we say to our children is right. Pretty
much every great worthwhile achievement in
human history, every discovery or accomplishment
that’s improved our lives, has been based on cooperation
and mutual aid; even now, most of us
spend more of our money on our friends and families
than on ourselves; while likely as not there will
always be competitive people in the world, there’s
no reason why society has to be based on encouraging
such behavior, let alone making people compete
over the basic necessities of life. That only
serves the interests of people in power, who want
us to live in fear of one another. That’s why anarchists
call for a society based not only on free association
but mutual aid. The fact is that most children
grow up believing in anarchist morality, and then
gradually have to realise that the adult world doesn’t
really work that way.
That’s why so many
become rebellious, or alienated, even suicidal as
adolescents, and finally, resigned and bitter as
adults; their only solace, often, being the ability to
raise children of their own and pretend to them that
the world is fair. But what if we really could start to
build a world that was at least founded on principles
of justice? Wouldn’t that be the greatest gift to our
children we could possibly give them?
* Do you believe that human beings are fundamentally
corrupt and evil, or that certain sorts of people
(women, people with different skin colour, ordinary
people who are not rich or highly educated) are inferior
specimens, destined to be ruled by their betters?
If you answered “yes”, then, well, it looks like
you aren’t an anarchist after all. But if you
answered “no’, then chances are you already subscribe
to 90% of anarchist principles, and, likely as
not, are living your life largely in accord with them.
Every time you treat another human with consideration
and respect, you are being an anarchist.
Every time you work out your differences with others
by coming to reasonable compromise, listening
to what everyone has to say rather than letting one
person decide for everyone else, you are being an
anarchist. Every time you have the opportunity to
force someone to do something, but decide to
appeal to their sense of reason or justice instead,
you are being an anarchist. The same goes for
every time you share something with a friend, or
decide who is going to do the dishes, or do anything
at all with an eye to fairness.
Now, you might object that all this is well and
good as a way for small groups of people to get on
with each other, but managing a city, or a country, is
an entirely different matter. And of course there is
something to this. Even if you decentralise society
and put as much power as possible in the hands of
small communities, there will still be plenty of things
that need to be co-ordinated, from running railroads
to deciding on directions for medical research. But
just because something is complicated does not
mean there is no way to do it democratically.
It would just be complicated. In fact, anarchists have
all sorts of different ideas and visions about how a
complex society might manage itself. To explain
them though would go far beyond the scope of a little
introductory text like this. All we can say is that
a lot of people have spent a lot of time coming up
with models for how a really democratic, healthy
society might work; but second, and just as importantly,
no anarchist claims to have a perfect blueprint.
The last thing we want is to impose prefab
models on society anyway. The truth is we probably
can’t even imagine half the problems that will
come up when we try to create a democratic society;
still, we’re confident that, human ingenuity being
what it is, such problems can always be solved, so
long as it is in the spirit of our basic principles -
which are, in the final analysis, simply the principles
of fundamental human decency.