I remember when the Anthrax “scare” happened after the 9/11 attacks. The timing seemed very, well, perfect.
It turns out that the strains of anthrax came from a military base and not this lone guy who the FBI claimed did it. More than that, many of the investigators on the 9/11 case were pulled away to deal with this new “threat”. Hmmm……conspiracy theory?
I am not sure but the fact remains that the anthrax came from a military base.
But there is more. Bush and Co. make a lot of money selling Anthrax to Iraq. If you don’t believe me go to BrassCheck.tv
But there is more. Bush and Co. sold a lot of Anthrax to Iraq. And then they sold a lot of Antrax ANTIDOTE to the military for US soldiers in Iraq. Hmmmm….. Bayer was involved and of course Rumsfeld. It turns out biological warfare even though theoretically illegal is a lucrative business….
This analysis of 9/11 film footage raises some important points. If is frustrating that 9/11 was washed over so effectively and that all this alternative information is not being addressed in the higher courts or police investigations. I look forward to the day when my government represents me.
Bottom line: the official story does not match film footage and eyewitness accounts, which vary enough to
This video of Vincent Bugliosi shows in clear words how large of a lie it was to say we needed to go to war on Iraq and how George and Co. acted as murderers. Very worth watching because it has the power to lul you out of your daily life and shift your view to what is happening on a worldly level.
I keep wanting to know WHY Bush and Co. felt justified to create the war. What great gain could possibly justify destroying a country and killing so many people? Was it just the money they would make from “rebuilding” Iraq? Was it the control they would gain over oil pipelines? What pot of gold are they after? Or is it some ideological game they are playing? Could it possibly be a deluded Christian attempt to kill Muslims? Hell, I have no idea!
A classic conspiracy - broken
The FDA has finally been forced by lawsuits and a court order to admit the obvious:
It’s hazardous to put mercury in people’s mouths.
People often wonder about “conspiracies.”
“How is it possible,” they ask “for big secrets to be kept for years? How can that many people keep a secret for that long?”
Mercury fillings is a classic example of how conspiracies work.
For years, using mercury in tooth fillings was illegal. Then World War II came along and the US government needed to bring tens of thousands of GIs up to dental “health” fast.
The multi-decade ban on mercury amalgams was lifted - and never restored.
Not only was the ban not restored, but the use of mercury in fillings was pushed and pushed hard. This is spite of the fact that mercury is a very dangerous toxin and dentists must apply strict controls on mercury in their possession.
Conspiracy 101: Buy off the media (and profession) and threaten the dissenters
Dentists who had concerns about the use of mercury were warned by the American Dental Association not to discuss them with patients. In some cases, outspoken dentists were threatened overtly with lawsuits and professional censure.
That’s how a multi-decade conspiracy was maintained. Now finally, some small, but public cracks are finally in the official story.
From claiming that mercury was “no problem at all,” the FDA was forced by court order to publish this statement recently:
“Dental amalgams contain mercury, which may have neurotoxic effects on the nervous systems of developing children and fetus.”
Moms Against Mercury (MomsAgainstMercury.org) and others filed the lawsuit against the FDA.
Yes, that’s what it takes a lawsuit to get the Food and Drug Administration to post plain vanilla truth about a dangerous substance on their web site.